My sister-in-law got married and the wedding photographer made a DVD with 412 pictures. Unfortunately, my parents-in-law could not read the DVD, either with Linux (which is their main OS) nor with Windows XP. So they gave the DVD to me and I had a look.

The DVD is a DVD-R and my Linux version (Hardy Heron) tried to open it: it showed the dialog asking if it should mount the DVD. A failure message opened asking me to have a look at dmesg. Hmm.

So I did and it said:

So I tried to install some kernel patches for udf.ko, but this did not help. The disc was still not recognized. In the end I decided to call upon the trusted program hexdump. Hexdump should be compulsory at kindergarten!

Browsing through the data with hexdump, I quickly recognized JPEG headers, so I wrote a small program (70 lines) to extract all JPEGs from a binary blob. You can download it.

The first megabyte of the DVD is here.

I learnt a something new about XML today, a part of the specification that deals one of the many edge cases that exist in every file format. To illustate this, lets take a look at a few examples. Why is this XML document well-formed :

<test>X</test>

this one also well-formed:

<test>& #9;</test>

But this document isn't:

<test>& #7;</test>

Note that I've added an extra space to these examples as the blogging software used by kdedevelopers.org seems to quote the characters required to make this appear directly.

To find out why it's broken, read on...

As one of my colleagues notes, this statement holds true on its own. However, for those like me too blind to see some things, there are two things about Flash you should know:

1. The latest Flash update fixes various critical security issues.
2. The latest Flash update does not work with anything that is not Gecko-based.

Do the maths yourself. Or just watch it happen as soon as your distribution's update hits your machine.

I'm not going to comment on the first one, but, as a person who has spent a good portion of the last two weeks trying to find a solution, I know some things about the second.

First of all, this is apparently perfectly fine with Adobe. According to their system requirements page, they care only about Firefox, Mozilla or SeaMonkey. Tough luck if you use something else (by the way, according to the latest Linux desktop survey, this something else is at least a quarter of Linux users). Imagine a critical security issue that will exist only when using Flash in Konqueror or Opera but not in Firefox (for whatever reason, like Adobe testing Flash only in Firefox) - care to guess what happens in such case? After all, you can give it a little test - just try to find out what happens if you complain to them that Flash doesn't work for you in Konqueror.

You know, I haven't been a huge fan of Moonlight, but there's definitely at least one thing to like about it - it's open source. Doesn't work? Have a look at the code.

Not so with Flash player. The reason why the latest Flash doesn't work originally appeared to be its new support of some Mozilla XEmbed-based extensions to the plugins API (funny thing about that link is, it says that it finally makes it work with Opera, while in fact it's exactly the opposite). After adding XEmbed support to Konqueror, it still didn't work. The page about the XEmbed extension has demo code hardcoding a hard dependency on Gtk2, so maybe adding Glib2 eventloop support will make it work? After all, the Flash system requirements page mentions this (well hidden in a footnote, if you look close enough), but not really, tough luck, even though the DiamondX testing plugin already works. Do you know what a ballistic approach to debugging is? You either hit, or you don't. Here next hit is that this Flash version doesn't handle properly repeated NPSetWindow() calls, which however happens to be the case with Konqueror. So finally, does it work? Well, kind of, if you don't mind it crashing everytime you leave a page. And it crashes in XtRemoveTimeOut() (incidentaly, a function that should not be called by a Gtk2-based plugin). That's been already taken care of as well - it's enough to give Flash the user agent string from Firefox, suddenly, no crash (I have no idea how Maksim managed to find this out - probably involved sacrificing chicken or something).

So, when can you expect the latest Flash to work with KDE? I have no idea. There are some preliminary patches I've made and committed to SVN, those may or may not work for you, depends on how lucky you'll get. Given that people report random crashes with those, I really meant to say lucky. Right now I'm trying to debug another issue where a proper fix that should remove a race condition actually prevents it from working. I also can't get keyboard focus right, even though debug output from DiamondX seems to look correct and I can't see any significant difference to Firefox. Maybe my fault ... maybe not, given what I know about how Flash handles keyboard input (you don't want to know).Opera people apparently have been more lucky with dealing with this, their latest beta should work better, but I could notice some problems there as well.

So, sorry. E.g. OpenSUSE will probably ship KDE updates for this tomorrow, but I suppose you'll be better off using the one true browser for the time being, if you need Flash. Next time I provide KWin videos only on youtube, somebody please yell at me. A lot. I'll deserve it.

PS: Yes, I know a Flash developer contancted kfm-devel somewhen in the past asking about XEmbed support. That still doesn't make debugging Flash any less painful, which is why the workarounds for it will take unknown time. It also doesn't change anything about Adobe not really giving a damn about Konqueror or Opera, if they could suddenly drop backwards compatibility (even though the code is probably still there, if it can still call XtRemoveTimeOut() and crash on it).

Bugs are bad, I think we all agree on this.
One of the most evil kind of bugs are those that appear only during installation or installation related procedures.

I wrote in an earlier blog that I have been helping the Debian-KDE packagers fix a bug.
Unfortunately, due to a side effect (I hate side effects), a newly installed KDE would no longer find the KControl modules!
The bugs does not appear when upgrading the packages since the old, wrong, directory is still there. So it took someone with a fresh installation to even discover the problem

Obviously the programs which are most likely to be bitten by this are installers. For example, a user posted to the debian-kde mailinglist that the Debian installer, or more likely its tasksel stage, have a bug when installing the desktop task, i.e. the KDE desktop is not installed correctly.
Since installers, especially new ones, are mostly used when a new distribution release is about to happen, so their developers are really the poor ones.
Lets hope the DDs can figure it out before the Etch release, would be a pitty to have the Debian desktop weaken while it is having heavy competition from derivatives.

What is the usual procedure to test installers, or how could regular users help testing them? Virtualisation? Spare machine?

Most development I do lately is not directly visible in KDE's source repository, but rather development for other projects connected to or interface with KDE.

Since I am a Debian user, a very happy one , I am following the debian-qt-kde mailinglist, to know about issues our Debian packagers might encounter.
Sometimes this requires just adding some information to a bug report, sometimes it requires doing some research in bug tracking systems and code respositories and sometimes it requires coding.

One of those which involve coding has been this one: removing the requirement for the SuperKaramba package to depend on XMMS by dlopen'ing libxmms instead of having it as a build-time option.

Those involving doing bug research are obviously less fun, nevertheless quite educating. The one I am currently on is this one:
the packages for KDE breaking KDE's compliance with the freedesktop.org menu specification.
Turns out the reason for the breakage is a hotfix/workaround for a conflict with a GNOME package ages ago!

Since it is very likely that the respective GNOME package has also been fixed by now, the correct KDE behavior can be restored in time for the Debian Etch release

So, off to check if I can fix the xdg-utils bug I discovered a few days ago.

P.S.: if you know somebody with knowledge about KURL internals, maybe we can even fix this problem

I had a frustrating hour today, I wanted to install suse on this spare machine here so I can test the KOffice packages on that, and other distros.
I choose the small image that downloads everything during the install; which is what I always do for installing Debian. (not that I install that more then ones per machine, but still, familiarity gets you points : ).

In case you have upgraded your fontconfig packages to those I provided in my blog entry about new fontconfig version, you may have run into KDE bug #116176 with the KDE3.5rc1 packages. Well, I warned you. That sometimes happens with unstable versions. I suggest you downgrade again or do your own build of newer fontconfig version or do whatever you want to do, but I'm not going to provide newer packages. It's still an unstable version after all.

Speaking of fontconfig bugs, with my current optimized KDE build I use for examining KDE startup performance, 1/3 (yes, that reads one third) of the startup time (with warm caches) is spent in fontconfig. And that's already this new unstable version of fontconfig with the better caches *sigh*. Fontconfig apparently still needs a lot of work.

Just in case you don't believe me, here is a gzipped file for sysprof. Download, gunzip, load into sysprof and see for yourself. Note that those 72.45 is actually 100%. And note that there's QFontDatabase::findFont() with 28.06 (==38.7%), which, if you expand the tree for it, is almost completely spent in fontconfig. Don't get me started on how KDE is so slow and bloated because we KDE developers don't care about performance.

We're reaching a milestone in KDE development: within the next few days, we'll hit Bug #100000 in bugs.kde.org.

So, I have taken the liberty of opening a poll on when the bug will hit the database. What do you think?

I think the new picture for the monitor used with the background preview doesn't entirely work as-is. This border looks weird. I tried to come up with a borderless version. This is a bit of a challenge because the code pretty much likes the actual preview to be square but the monitor really looks better with round edges.